<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: in defense of the (whole) hymn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/in-defense-of-the-whole-hymn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/in-defense-of-the-whole-hymn/</link>
	<description>my mind in words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Rev'd R E LANGFORD Jr, FAPC, ELCA pastor (ret.)</title>
		<link>http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/in-defense-of-the-whole-hymn/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rev'd R E LANGFORD Jr, FAPC, ELCA pastor (ret.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-979</guid>
		<description>I read somewhere that the original, untranslated,
verses of the hymn went to a total of eight. Only
the first two were put into English. The third in
English is not part of the original supposedly. Has
anyone else seen, or researched, such a rumor?

Lutherans (LBW type) suggest this as a &quot;Hymn of
The Day&quot; for today, Day of Saint Michael and All
Angels, 29 September. IMO what we need is a suitable
verse addressing commemoration of Saint Michael (and
All Angels) to be sung to &quot;By all your Saints in Warfare&quot;
or some such hymn.
BLESSINGS,
R E LANGFORD JR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere that the original, untranslated,<br />
verses of the hymn went to a total of eight. Only<br />
the first two were put into English. The third in<br />
English is not part of the original supposedly. Has<br />
anyone else seen, or researched, such a rumor?</p>
<p>Lutherans (LBW type) suggest this as a &#8220;Hymn of<br />
The Day&#8221; for today, Day of Saint Michael and All<br />
Angels, 29 September. IMO what we need is a suitable<br />
verse addressing commemoration of Saint Michael (and<br />
All Angels) to be sung to &#8220;By all your Saints in Warfare&#8221;<br />
or some such hymn.<br />
BLESSINGS,<br />
R E LANGFORD JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/in-defense-of-the-whole-hymn/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-941</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree.  &quot;A Mighty Fortress Is Our God&quot; is another one that you just can&#039;t skip around in, especially with the first/last verse model that many employ. You hit the fourth stanza and ask... &quot;what word?&quot;  

For me, the distinguishing factor for hymns is a continuity of thought, a progressive exploration of who God is, what he has done, or the process of salvation.  Praise songs you can jump from verse to verse, sing a chorus a couple times, and not lose the continuity.  But hymns just don&#039;t fit into that flexibility.

As to the lack of content in praise songs, often identified as only one verse sung over and over or even one phrase repeated, I have mixed feelings.  They certainly aren&#039;t my favorite songs, but there is scriptural basis for them.  Psalm 117 is a single stanza, and 136 repeats &quot;for his steadfast love endures forever&quot; in every verse!  Certainly these shouldn&#039;t be the only songs we sing (there are 148 other psalms, after all), but we can&#039;t say they have no place in worship.  (Not saying that&#039;s your stance, but I have run into that opinion before.)

As for the Garrison Keillor shout out, bring on the PHC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree.  &#8220;A Mighty Fortress Is Our God&#8221; is another one that you just can&#8217;t skip around in, especially with the first/last verse model that many employ. You hit the fourth stanza and ask&#8230; &#8220;what word?&#8221;  </p>
<p>For me, the distinguishing factor for hymns is a continuity of thought, a progressive exploration of who God is, what he has done, or the process of salvation.  Praise songs you can jump from verse to verse, sing a chorus a couple times, and not lose the continuity.  But hymns just don&#8217;t fit into that flexibility.</p>
<p>As to the lack of content in praise songs, often identified as only one verse sung over and over or even one phrase repeated, I have mixed feelings.  They certainly aren&#8217;t my favorite songs, but there is scriptural basis for them.  Psalm 117 is a single stanza, and 136 repeats &#8220;for his steadfast love endures forever&#8221; in every verse!  Certainly these shouldn&#8217;t be the only songs we sing (there are 148 other psalms, after all), but we can&#8217;t say they have no place in worship.  (Not saying that&#8217;s your stance, but I have run into that opinion before.)</p>
<p>As for the Garrison Keillor shout out, bring on the PHC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Basselman</title>
		<link>http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/in-defense-of-the-whole-hymn/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Basselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericbjorlin.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Hey Eric,

THis worship planner RARELY drops verses.  I ALWAYS read through the entire text of the hymn before making any decision about cutting verses.

You&#039;ll never see me cutting any of the 8 verses of &quot;For All the Saints&quot; - you simply can&#039;t - it tells a story!

I have to agree with you about the lack of theological content in so many newer praise songs.  It would be very difficult for me to serve as a worship planner in a congregation that didn&#039;t use good solid hymnody!

Thank you for your comments.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eric,</p>
<p>THis worship planner RARELY drops verses.  I ALWAYS read through the entire text of the hymn before making any decision about cutting verses.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll never see me cutting any of the 8 verses of &#8220;For All the Saints&#8221; &#8211; you simply can&#8217;t &#8211; it tells a story!</p>
<p>I have to agree with you about the lack of theological content in so many newer praise songs.  It would be very difficult for me to serve as a worship planner in a congregation that didn&#8217;t use good solid hymnody!</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
